9/11 and particularity the plane issue is the number one example of cognitive dissonance.

PAGE CONTENTS:

1. THE IMPOSSIBLE CRASH PHYSICS
   • NEWTON’S LAWS OF MOTION
   • WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED
   • DOES IT LOOK REAL TO YOU?
2. MISSING WINGS
3. LACK OF WAKE VORTEX AT WTC
4. THE EMPTY HOLES – WHERE IS THE WRECKAGE?
   • THE PLANE DOES NOT FIT
5. 9/11 PLANE SPEEDS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPOSSIBLE
   • EXPERTS CONFIRM IMPOSSIBLE SPEED
   • THE FLUTTER TEST
6. EMERGENCY LOCATOR TRANSMITTER (ETL)
7. THERE ARE NO OFFICIAL CRASH INVESTIGATION REPORTS
8. THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS
   • WTC
   • PENTAGON
   • SHANKSVILLE
9. ANDREW JOHNSON’S 9/11 PLANE WITNESS STUDY
   • PLANE WITNESSES
   • NO PLANE WITNESSES
   • LACK OF NOISE – THE CONSPICUOUS ABSENCE OF THE DEAFENING NOISE OF A LARGE LOW FLYING JETLINER
10. BTS AND ACARS RECORDS
11. WHAT ABOUT THE PASSENGERS?
    • OPERATION NORTHWOODS
    • THE HIJACKERS
    • THE 9/11 PHONE CALLS
12. 9/11 FLIGHT 175 RADAR DATA 3D ANALYSIS BY RICHARD D. HALL
13. ADVANCED HOLOGRAM / 3D IMAGE PROJECTION TECHNOLOGY?
    • WITNESS TESTIMONY INDICATES A HOLOGRAM
    • THE TECHNOLOGY – WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN?
14. CONCLUSION
    • VIDEO FAKERY OR HOLOGRAMS / 3D IMAGE PROJECTION?
    • WHY NOT USE REAL PLANES?
15. DR. MORGAN REYNOLDS LEGAL CASE AGAINST NIST CONTRACTORS FOR 9/11 PLANE FRAUD

1. THE IMPOSSIBLE CRASH PHYSICS

How could two Boeing 767 jetliners, which are essentially big hollow aluminum tubes, cut through multiple steel girders and concrete floors to completely penetrate the massive steel towers, with no deceleration visible, and disappear witout a trace, with no plane wreckage visible in the holes and no wreckage fall to the ground below the impact zone? Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.

NEWTON’S THIRD LAW OF MOTION: “FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION”

Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower as is seen in the videos.

An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel beam. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the beam is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the beam; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.

The alleged 9/11 jetliners would not just have had to fly through glass windows as some people seem to imagine. On top of having to penetrate past the 1/4 inch thick steel beams, the alleged planes would have struck floors that contained at minimum 4 inches thick of concrete poured on 22-gauge fluted steel plates interwoven underneath with supporting steel trusses. There is simply no possible way that any part of an aluminum plane, especially not the wings, striking such a building could pierce edgewise through the barrier posed by the concrete floors and supporting fluted steel flooring and trusses.

The above diagram shows that “Flight 175” was intersecting with eight (8) floors that consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and to the external support columns at the other, where each floor was covered with 4-8” of concrete, representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane’s penetration into the building.

In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.